Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF

Shareclass
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF (GEME)
Type
Exchange-traded fund
Gender equality score
Gender equality score

53
/ 100 points
Overall score
Average Equileap Gender Equality Score of fund holdings, weighted by market value
Peer rank
Group ranking

Unranked

Not ranked due to low data coverage

% Equileap coverage
4.49%
Gender balance in leadership and workforce
Gender balance in leadership and workforce
27/40
See the score criteria
Equal compensation and work life balance
Equal compensation and work life balance
11/30
See the score criteria
Policies promoting gender equality
Policies promoting gender equality
15/20
See the score criteria
Commitment, transparency, and accountability
Commitment, transparency, and accountability
0/10
See the score criteria
Top scoring holdings
Top scoring holdings
The top 2 holdings in this portfolio with the best scores on the Equileap Gender Scorecard. In the case of ties, the holding with more assets invested is listed higher.
  • 1. Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA
    3.07% of assets
    $1.24M invested
  • 2. PKO Bank Polski SA
    1.42% of assets
    $574,489 invested
Bottom scoring holdings
Bottom scoring holdings
The bottom 2 holdings in this portfolio with the worst scores on the Equileap Gender Scorecard. In the case of ties, the holding with more assets invested is listed higher.
  • 1. Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA
    3.07% of assets
    $1.24M invested
  • 2. PKO Bank Polski SA
    1.42% of assets
    $574,489 invested
Find sustainably-invested mutual funds and ETFs



Search for funds from your 401(k), retirement plan, or personal portfolio
Financial performance
Performance data provided byMorningstarFind more financial data on GEME at Morningstar.com
Gender Equality and Returns
  Less than one year of returns available
Benchmarking tool
Current fund
GEME
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
Family
Pacific Capital Partners Limited
Category
Diversified Emerging Mkts
vs.
Benchmark
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Family
iShares from BlackRock
Category
Foreign Large Blend
Fund comparison settings
Investment timeline
Performance as of: 4/30/25
  Less than one year of returns available
Benchmark
Suggested: MSCI ACWI Ex USA
ACWX - iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Fund comparison results
Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:
  Less than one year of returns available
Lower overall gender equality score 
4 / 100 points lower
Higher gender balance in leadership and workforce score 
1 / 40 points higher
Lower equal compensation and work life balance score 
2 / 30 points lower
Lower policies promoting gender equality score 
2 / 20 points lower
Lower commitment, transparency, and accountability score 
1 / 10 points lower
Current fund
GEME
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
Family
Pacific Capital Partners Limited
Category
Diversified Emerging Mkts
vs.
Benchmark
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Family
iShares from BlackRock
Category
Foreign Large Blend
Fund comparison settings
Investment timeline
Performance as of: 4/30/25
  Less than one year of returns available
Benchmark
Suggested: MSCI ACWI Ex USA
ACWX - iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Fund comparison results
Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:
  Less than one year of returns available
Lower overall gender equality score 
4 / 100 points lower
Higher gender balance in leadership and workforce score 
1 / 40 points higher
Lower equal compensation and work life balance score 
2 / 30 points lower
Lower policies promoting gender equality score 
2 / 20 points lower
Lower commitment, transparency, and accountability score 
1 / 10 points lower
Current fund
GEME
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
Family
Pacific Capital Partners Limited
Category
Diversified Emerging Mkts
vs.
Benchmark
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Family
iShares from BlackRock
Category
Foreign Large Blend
Fund comparison settings
Investment timeline
Performance as of: 4/30/25
  Less than one year of returns available
Benchmark
Suggested: MSCI ACWI Ex USA
ACWX - iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
Fund comparison results
Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:
  Less than one year of returns available
Lower overall gender equality score 
4 / 100 points lower
Higher gender balance in leadership and workforce score 
1 / 40 points higher
Lower equal compensation and work life balance score 
2 / 30 points lower
Lower policies promoting gender equality score 
2 / 20 points lower
Lower commitment, transparency, and accountability score 
1 / 10 points lower
Month-end trailing returns  
Annualized returns
Gender-lens analysis
1-yr
3-yr
5-yr
10-yr
Overall gender equality score
This fund
GEME - Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
/
/
/
/
53  / 100 points
Benchmark
ACWX - iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
13%
8.32%
10%
4.72%
57  / 100 points
Fund compared to benchmark
 
  Less than one year of returns available
4  / 100 points lower
Find more financial data on GEME at Morningstar.com
What's next?
Learn how to make a change and move your money
Get started with our action toolkit
Ask your employer about gender-lens investing in your retirement plan
Find socially responsible funds that invest in gender equality
Learn more about As You Sow's Invest Your Values program
Visit Fossil Free Funds to measure the climate risk of this portfolio
More from Invest Your Values
See how mutual funds and ETFs are rated on issues ranging from fossil fuels, to deforestation, gender equality, guns, prisons, weapons, and tobacco

Disclaimer: As You Sow is not an investment adviser

As You Sow is not an investment adviser as that term is defined under federal and state (California) laws and regulations. As You Sow is a tax-exempt, nonprofit organization dedicated to educating and empowering shareholders to change corporations for the good through the collection, analysis and dissemination of relevant information to the public, free of charge. As You Sow does not provide financial planning, legal or tax advice. Nothing on this website shall constitute or be construed as an offering of financial instruments, or as investment advice or investment recommendations.
See our full disclaimer