1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund

Shareclass
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced A (SSIAX)
Type
Open-end mutual fund
Manager
Sustainability mandate
Member of US-SIF
Gender equality score
Gender equality score

52
/ 100 points
Overall score
Average Equileap Gender Equality Score of fund holdings, weighted by market value
Peer rank
Group ranking

C
47.6
percentile

Universe: Groups

Group: Allocation Funds

Ranking: 356 out of 677 funds


See more funds from this group
 All funds
 Groups
 Categories
Gender balance in leadership and workforce
Gender balance in leadership and workforce
26/40
See the score criteria
Equal compensation and work life balance
Equal compensation and work life balance
8/30
See the score criteria
Policies promoting gender equality
Policies promoting gender equality
18/20
See the score criteria
Commitment, transparency, and accountability
Commitment, transparency, and accountability
1/10
See the score criteria
Member of USSIF
This fund is a member of a sustainable and responsible investing group, and has a posted policy on their consideration of diversity and equal employment opportunity policies and practices relating to employees, company ownership or contractors.
Combination of Positive and Restricted/Exclusionary Strategies.  More
US-SIF member fund managers: want to update your statement?  Contact us
Top scoring holdings
Top scoring holdings
The top 10 holdings in this portfolio with the best scores on the Equileap Gender Scorecard. In the case of ties, the holding with more assets invested is listed higher.
  • 1. AstraZeneca PLC ADR
    1.04% of assets
    $8.21M invested
  • 2. Bank of America Corp
    1.42% of assets
    $11.22M invested
  • 3. Boston Scientific Corp
    1.9% of assets
    $15.09M invested
  • 4. Intuit Inc
    1.13% of assets
    $8.96M invested
  • 5. Microsoft Corp
    4.86% of assets
    $38.5M invested
  • 6. PepsiCo Inc
    0.92% of assets
    $7.27M invested
  • 7. Zoetis Inc Class A
    0.71% of assets
    $5.59M invested
  • 8. American Water Works Co Inc
    1.12% of assets
    $8.87M invested
  • 9. Salesforce Inc
    1.75% of assets
    $13.84M invested
  • 10. Workday Inc Class A
    0.77% of assets
    $6.13M invested
Bottom scoring holdings
Bottom scoring holdings
The bottom 10 holdings in this portfolio with the worst scores on the Equileap Gender Scorecard. In the case of ties, the holding with more assets invested is listed higher.
  • 1. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc Ordinary Shares
    0.94% of assets
    $7.47M invested
  • 2. Steel Dynamics Inc
    0.7% of assets
    $5.52M invested
  • 3. Advanced Drainage Systems Inc
    1.38% of assets
    $10.9M invested
  • 4. Cintas Corp
    1.72% of assets
    $13.66M invested
  • 5. Darling Ingredients Inc
    0.36% of assets
    $2.85M invested
  • 6. Costco Wholesale Corp
    1.56% of assets
    $12.39M invested
  • 7. Charles Schwab Corp
    1.13% of assets
    $8.93M invested
  • 8. Broadcom Inc
    2.18% of assets
    $17.32M invested
  • 9. Linde PLC
    1.07% of assets
    $8.51M invested
  • 10. SolarEdge Technologies Inc
    0.22% of assets
    $1.72M invested
Find sustainably-invested mutual funds and ETFs



Search for funds from your 401(k), retirement plan, or personal portfolio
Financial performance
Performance data provided byMorningstarFind more financial data on SSIAX at Morningstar.com
Gender Equality and Returns
Returns chart for 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund
Enlarge
The figure above charts annualized returns and Gender Equality Fund grades. The orange marker represents this fund. The purple marker (if present) represents an assigned benchmark. Blue dots represent funds in the same Morningstar category as this fund. Dark gray dots represent funds in the same grading group as this fund. Returns are for the most recent available for this fund of 1, 3, 5, or 10 year annualized returns. The higher a fund is marked on the Y axis, the better its returns for the specified time period. The higher a fund is marked on the X axis, the better its Gender Equality Funds group ranking. Read more on the How it Works page.
Benchmarking tool
Current fund
SSIAX
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund
Family
1919 Funds
Category
Moderate Allocation
vs.
Benchmark
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Family
iShares from BlackRock
Category
Large Blend
Fund comparison settings
Investment timeline
Performance as of: 3/31/24
1 year
3 years
5 years
10 years
Benchmark
Suggested: Not available
IVV - iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Fund comparison results
Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:
Lower 10-yr returns 
4.25% less  in annualized returns
Lower overall gender equality score 
2 / 100 points lower
Lower gender balance in leadership and workforce score 
1 / 40 points lower
Same equal compensation and work life balance score 
0 / 30 points 
Same policies promoting gender equality score 
0 / 20 points 
Same commitment, transparency, and accountability score 
0 / 10 points 
Current fund
SSIAX
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund
Family
1919 Funds
Category
Moderate Allocation
vs.
Benchmark
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Family
iShares from BlackRock
Category
Large Blend
Fund comparison settings
Investment timeline
Performance as of: 3/31/24
1 year
3 years
5 years
10 years
Benchmark
Suggested: Not available
IVV - iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Fund comparison results
Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:
Lower 10-yr returns 
4.25% less  in annualized returns
Lower overall gender equality score 
2 / 100 points lower
Lower gender balance in leadership and workforce score 
1 / 40 points lower
Same equal compensation and work life balance score 
0 / 30 points 
Same policies promoting gender equality score 
0 / 20 points 
Same commitment, transparency, and accountability score 
0 / 10 points 
Current fund
SSIAX
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund
Family
1919 Funds
Category
Moderate Allocation
vs.
Benchmark
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Family
iShares from BlackRock
Category
Large Blend
Fund comparison settings
Investment timeline
Performance as of: 3/31/24
1 year
3 years
5 years
10 years
Benchmark
Suggested: Not available
IVV - iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Fund comparison results
Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:
Lower 10-yr returns 
4.25% less  in annualized returns
Lower overall gender equality score 
2 / 100 points lower
Lower gender balance in leadership and workforce score 
1 / 40 points lower
Same equal compensation and work life balance score 
0 / 30 points 
Same policies promoting gender equality score 
0 / 20 points 
Same commitment, transparency, and accountability score 
0 / 10 points 
Month-end trailing returns  
Annualized returns
Gender-lens analysis
1-yr
3-yr
5-yr
10-yr
Overall gender equality score
This fund
SSIAX - 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund
22%
6.16%
10%
8.67%
52  / 100 points
Benchmark
IVV - iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
30%
11%
15%
13%
54  / 100 points
Fund compared to benchmark
 
-7.68%
-5.31%
-4.7%
-4.25%
2  / 100 points lower
Find more financial data on SSIAX at Morningstar.com
What's next?
Learn how to make a change and move your money
Get started with our action toolkit
Ask your employer about gender-lens investing in your retirement plan
Find socially responsible funds that invest in gender equality
Learn more about As You Sow's Invest Your Values program
Visit Fossil Free Funds to measure the climate risk of this portfolio
More from Invest Your Values
See how mutual funds and ETFs are rated on issues ranging from fossil fuels, to deforestation, gender equality, guns, prisons, weapons, and tobacco

Disclaimer: As You Sow is not an investment adviser

As You Sow is not an investment adviser as that term is defined under federal and state (California) laws and regulations. As You Sow is a tax-exempt, nonprofit organization dedicated to educating and empowering shareholders to change corporations for the good through the collection, analysis and dissemination of relevant information to the public, free of charge. As You Sow does not provide financial planning, legal or tax advice. Nothing on this website shall constitute or be construed as an offering of financial instruments, or as investment advice or investment recommendations.
See our full disclaimer